Cover: The Indonesian Family Life Survey

The Indonesian Family Life Survey

Overview and Descriptive Analysis of the Population, Health, and Education Data

Published 1995

by Carl Serrato, Glenn Melnick

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 9.1 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

This report describes the Indonesian Family Life Survey (IFLS); presents some of the findings suggested by descriptive analyses of the survey's population, health, and education data; highlights important policy issues the findings shed light upon; and suggests areas where more rigorous, multivariate analyses are needed. Conducted in 1993 and 1994 by RAND, in conjunction with Lembaga Demografi at the University of Indonesia, the IFLS consists of a national household survey and matched community survey. The household survey contains 13 provinces comprising about 83 percent of the Indonesian population. The community survey contains data on the availability, prices, and quality of health, family planning, and school facilities in the household respondents' immediate communities. Several features of the IFLS make it unique among surveys in Indonesia as well as many other developing countries. First, it is a multipurpose survey, collecting a broad array of detailed demographic, health, education, and economic information on individuals, households, and communities. Second, the IFLS contains information on individuals of all ages, including current as well as retrospective data. Third, the matched household and community surveys enable researchers to integrate individual, household, and community data, so they can better understand how surrounding conditions influence family behavior and can more readily assess the effects of existing and potential public policies and programs.

This report is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.