This paper examines whether historical differences across states in AFDC benefits affected the location decisions of AFDC recipients and those eligible for AFDC. Two estimation strategies are employed. The first strategy is to ascertain whether in equilibrium and holding all else constant individuals are distributed more heavily in high-benefit states. The second strategy is to analyze the effect of changes in benefits over time on individuals' decisions to change locations. The two empirical strategies yield consistent results. Benefit differentials across states do not appear to shift the equilibrium distribution of individuals toward higher-benefit states and changes in AFDC benefits over time do not significantly affect individuals' decisions to change locations.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.
This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.
Permission is given to duplicate this electronic document for personal use only, as long as it is unaltered and complete. Copies may not be duplicated for commercial purposes. Unauthorized posting of RAND PDFs to a non-RAND Web site is prohibited. RAND PDFs are protected under copyright law. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please visit the RAND Permissions page.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.