The Arts and Prosocial Impact Study

An Examination of Best Practices

Ann Stone, David J. McArthur, Sally Ann Law, Joy S. Moini

Published 1997

The broad goal of this study is to provide evidence that fine-arts programs can contribute in quantifiable and positive ways to solving important social problems such as crime and violence.

Topics

Document Details

  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 1997
  • Paperback Pages: 75
  • Document Number: DRU-1686-LADCA

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Stone, Ann, David J. McArthur, Sally Ann Law, and Joy S. Moini, The Arts and Prosocial Impact Study: An Examination of Best Practices, RAND Corporation, DRU-1686-LADCA, 1997. As of September 25, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU1686.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Stone, Ann, David J. McArthur, Sally Ann Law, and Joy S. Moini, The Arts and Prosocial Impact Study: An Examination of Best Practices. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1997. https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU1686.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.