Grandparent Care and Welfare

Assessing the Impact of Public Policy on Split and Three Generation Families

Amy G. Cox, Anne R. Pebley

Published 1999

Grandparent caregiving has received increased attention in recent years, and grandparent-grandchild families have generated several public policy concerns, including whether grandparent-led families face barriers to obtaining public assistance. The authors address this question by comparing the welfare eligibility and use of grandparent-grandchild families with that of other families. After investigating the relative need for and use of AFDC, food stamps, and Medicaid, the authors analyze the determinants of program use among children in different family types. Using data from the 1992 Survey of Income and Program Participation, the authors find that grandparent-led families, particularly split generation families, are actually more likely than other family types to receive government assistance. The authors conclude by considering the potential consequences of welfare reform for grandparent-grandchild families in light of our findings.

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: RAND Corporation
  • Availability: Web-Only
  • Year: 1999
  • Paperback Pages: 40
  • Document Number: DRU-2166-NICHD/NIA

Citation

RAND Style Manual
Cox, Amy G. and Anne R. Pebley, Grandparent Care and Welfare: Assessing the Impact of Public Policy on Split and Three Generation Families, RAND Corporation, DRU-2166-NICHD/NIA, 1999. As of September 5, 2024: https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2166.html
Chicago Manual of Style
Cox, Amy G. and Anne R. Pebley, Grandparent Care and Welfare: Assessing the Impact of Public Policy on Split and Three Generation Families. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation, 1999. https://www.rand.org/pubs/drafts/DRU2166.html.
BibTeX RIS

This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.