Cover: Evaluating Health Care Reform Using the Health and Retirement Survey

Evaluating Health Care Reform Using the Health and Retirement Survey

A Case Study of the Health Security Act of 1993

Published 1994

by Dana P. Goldman, Paul Gertler, James P. Smith

Purchase Print Copy

Add to Cart Paperback23 pages Free

Health care reform could dramatically alter the health care landscape. While there is substantial disagreement over the changes that should be implemented, there appears to be a consensus within the Federal Government that insurance markets need reform. To forecast the likely effects of reform, it is necessary to construct models of consumer behavior. The new Health and Retirement Survey (HRS), because of its thorough data elements and longitudinal sampling frame, is uniquely suited to answer the key behavioral questions associated with health care form. This paper describes how the HRS can be used to forecast some of the likely behavioral responses of mature Americans (aged 51 to 61) to the Health Security Act of 1993 (HSA) and as a benchmark to evaluate the impact of any health care reform. The authors draw attention to the 1992 round of the HRS as a tool for analyzing the likely impact of HSA on insurance choice, health care utilization, health outcomes, family labor supply and retirement, wealth, intergenerational transfers and living arrangements. They discuss how future waves of the HRS could be used to explain the dynamic relationships between deteriorating health, asset decumulation, and employment as individuals move further along the life-cycle.

This report is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.