Cover: Income Shares and Shares of Income:  Empirical Tests of Models of Household Resource Allocations

Income Shares and Shares of Income: Empirical Tests of Models of Household Resource Allocations

Published 1994

by Duncan Thomas, Chien-Lian Chen

Download eBook for Free

FormatFile SizeNotes
PDF file 1.6 MB

Use Adobe Acrobat Reader version 10 or higher for the best experience.

Using household budget survey data from Taiwan, this paper tests an implication of the common preference model: that is, shifting the distribution of resources within the household should have no impact on household commodity demand. For some goods, this implication is rejected by the data. We turn, therefore, to a more general individualistic model of the household and determine whether the data are consistent with household members choosing allocations Pareto efficiently. Treating household income as endogenous (or measured with error) the answer is an unambiguously affirmative and our evidence for Taiwan is consistent with empirical results reported for France (in Bourguignon, Browning, Chiappori and Lechene, 1993) and for Canada (in Browning, Bourguignon, Chiappori and Lechene, 1993). There is some suggestion that the common preference model may not be rejected for all sub-groups in the data and so the final section of the paper attempts to identify some of the characteristics of these households.

This report is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.

This research in the public interest was supported by RAND, using discretionary funds made possible by the generosity of RAND's donors, the fees earned on client-funded research, and independent research and development (IR&D) funds provided by the Department of Defense.

This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.