Demographics, Sectoral Change, and Changing Relative Wages: A Regional Approach
Published 1994
Published 1994
Since the mid-1970s, U.S. wage inequality has increased sharply. While there are many possible explanations for this increase, previous attempts at explanation have been limited by the small numbers of degrees of freedom in the aggregate time-series data. In this paper, the authors reexamine the relative importance of various explanations of the increase in wage inequality using a time-series of cross-sections of data on local labor markets, greatly increasing the number of degrees of freedom and the authors' ability to distinguish secular change from true structural causes of increasing earnings inequality. The authors disaggregated results confirm earlier analyses suggesting the importance of changes in the relative supply of education groups, unemployment, and unionization; but the authors find little evidence for the importance of changes in the sectoral composition of output.
This publication is part of the RAND draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of RAND from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other, more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences, similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts have been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.
This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law. This representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for noncommercial use only. Unauthorized posting of this publication online is prohibited; linking directly to this product page is encouraged. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of its research documents for commercial purposes. For information on reprint and reuse permissions, please visit www.rand.org/pubs/permissions.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.