Important strides have been made in recent years in our understanding of determinants of levels, accumulation, and portfolios of wealth. While the issues examined are extremely diverse, they are linked by a common need for reasonably reliable wealth and savings data to test their basic implications. Unfortunately, the quality of the wealth modules in current survey data fails to meet that need. In this paper, the authors argue that some relatively simple survey innovations used in the recently fielded Health and Retirement Survey (HRS) may go a long way toward significantly improving the quality of economic data. These innovations involve the option of bracket responses given to respondents who initially refused or were unable to provide an exact value for their assets or income. These bracket categories not only substantially reduced item non-response, but they also greatly improved the accuracy of imputations of missing economic data. Equally important for testing economic models about the motives underlying savings behavior, the size of the bias is not uniform across ages. Existing surveys distort the age-wealth profile by understating wealth in the pre-retirement years relative to the post-retirement years by more than 10 percent. HRS survey innovations are easily transported to other surveys and would, at relatively low cost, substantially improve the accuracy of their economic data.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation Draft series. The unrestricted draft was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003 that represented preliminary or prepublication versions of other more formal RAND products for distribution to appropriate external audiences. The draft could be considered similar to an academic discussion paper. Although unrestricted drafts had been approved for circulation, they were not usually formally edited or peer reviewed.
Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.