Cover: Providing Primary General Medical Care in University Hospitals

Providing Primary General Medical Care in University Hospitals

Efficiency and Cost

Published In: Annals of Internal Medicine, v. 107, no. 3, Sep. 1987, p. 399-405

Posted on 1987

by Jacqueline Kosecoff, Robert H. Brook, Arlene Fink, Caren Kamberg, Carol P. Roth, George A. Goldberg, Lawrence S. Linn, Virginia Clark, Joseph P. Newhouse, Thomas L. Delbanco

Data on efficiency, costs, and profits of 15 internal medicine outpatient group practices in university hospitals were collected for 9 months from interviews, a time-motion study, observations, and reviews of bills. Charges for a follow-up visit were about 25% higher than Medicare's allowable charges, but differed threefold across practices. Physicians spent more than half their allocated patient care or supervision time in other activities and 14% of nursing time was used for direct patient care. Visits to second- and third-year residents cost one half of those to faculty. Faculty supervision of second- and third-year residents was limited; it was, on average, 2 minutes per follow-up visit. Despite these inefficiencies, bad debts, and educational costs, practices appeared to break even financially. We conclude it is financially feasible for university hospitals to provide primary care to disadvantaged populations.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.