Competition and Quality

Published in: Health Affairs, v. 7, no. 3, Summer 1988, p. 150-161

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1988

by Robert H. Brook, Jacqueline Kosecoff

Read More

Access further information on this document at content.healthaffairs.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The world changes, and even the health care system is affected. Many consider the future of the fee-for-service system in the United States, the free-market center of the world, to be gloomy. Its antithesis, fixed payment per capita care, is here to stay. Increasingly, physicians work as employees, patients have become consumers, and business school graduates are assuming control. As independent-practice-model health maintenance organizations (HMOs) grow rapidly, staff- and group-model HMOs are scared: will they go the way of the fee-for-service system? Competition, for the time being, seems to be king. This article is written by a physician and a social scientist who, collectively, have devoted thirty years to researching quality of care. We have read hundreds of papers about quality of care. Most contain little or no data. Most proclaim the need for more or better data. Most make conclusions even when there are no data. Should they be read? Should their advice be heeded? These are not easy questions, particularly when the search for answers has become so intense.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.