Using DRGS to Pay for Inpatient Substance Abuse Services

An Assessment of the Champus Reimbursement System

Published In: Medical Care, v. 29, no. 6, June 1991, p. 565-577

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1991

by Jack Zwanziger, Lois M. Davis, Anil Bamezai, Susan D. Hosek

Read More

Access further information on this document at journals.lww.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

In October 1988, the Civilian Health and Medical Program of the Uniformed Services (CHAMPUS) introduced a prospective payment system based on diagnostic-related groups (DRGs) to pay for substance abuse services. These services were initially excluded from the new payment system because of concerns that a DRG-based system may have a large and poorly understood financial impact on individual hospitals. This report assesses the performance of a DRG system in explaining variation in costs at the individual patient level and evaluates how well this payment system predicts resource use across hospitals. Overall, the substance abuse DRGs explained only 4.2% of the total variance in charges. It was found that the Medicare DRG-based system had to be modified to reflect the characteristics of the younger CHAMPUS population by splitting DRG 435 to account for the increased costliness of beneficiaries younger than 21 years. In addition, the study revealed substantial variation in the impact of the DRG system on hospital revenue. These differences largely reflected significant differences between general and specialty hospitals.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.