Regional Differences in Appropriateness of Cholecystectomy in a Prepaid Health Insurance System

Published in: Public Health Review, v. 20, 1992/93, p. 61-74

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1992

by Dina Pilpel, Gerald M. Fraser, Jacqueline Kosecoff, S Weitzman, Robert H. Brook

This study describes the quality of antidepressant medication use at hospital discharge for depressed elderly inpatients and compares quality of care before and after implementation of Medicare's Prospective Payment System (PPS). The study reviewed data from medical records of 2746 depressed, elderly, hospitalized patients in acute-care general medical hospitals in five U.S. states (pre-PPS period 1981-82; post-PPS period 1985-86). The majority were discharged on antidepressant medication both pre-PPS and post-PPS. After PPS' implementation, sedating medications were used less often in all treatment settings. In general medical wards, a higher percentage post-PPS (24%) than pre-PPS (14%) were discharged 48 hours or less after first starting an antidepressant medication. In both time periods, one-third of patients receiving antidepressant medications were prescribed daily dosages at discharge below recommended, minimum, therapeutic levels, whether treated in general medical wards or psychiatric units. Otherwise, patients previously treated in psychiatric units received higher quality of medication management than those treated in general medical wards. Over time, patients discharged on antidepressant medication were less likely to use sedating medication, suggesting improved quality of care. In general medical wards, however, patients were discharged more rapidly after starting medication, possibly suggesting lower quality of care. A substantial percentage of patients received subtherapeutic dosages of medication or sedating medications, suggesting that improved management of discharge antidepressant medication in the elderly is needed in general medical hospitals.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.