Institutional and Economic Influences on Quality of Nursing Documentation

Published In: Health Care Management Review, v. 19, no. 4, 1994, p. 9-19

Posted on on January 01, 1994

by Louise Parker, Kenneth B. Wells, Joan L. Buchanan, Bernadette Benjamin

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Reports on the quality of nursing documentation for over 2,500 depressed, elderly Medicare patients hospitalized in one of 277 general hospitals, either prior to or after the implementation of the prospective payment system (PPS). Data came from the RAND Prospective Payment/Quality of Care Study. The article presents five conclusions of the documentation study: (1) Nursing documentation in hospital charts generally increased following the implementation of PPS. (2) Documentation of psychiatric phenomena was more thorough for patients who had spent at least one day in a psychiatric unit than for patients who had never been in a psychiatric unit. (3) Documentation of cognitive status was much more thorough for patients who had never been in a psychiatric unit. (4) Nursing staff levels had virtually no effect on the quality of documentation. (5) Across all time periods and hospitals, a low proportion of patients had relevant nursing notes. For example, on the first day of hospitalization for depression, 15 percent of pre-PPS and 32 percent of post-PPS patients had notes concerning suicidality. At discharge, nursing notes on cognitive status were present for less than 40 percent of pre-PPS patients and less than 50 percent of post-PPS patients. The authors state that unless standardized forms and tools are employed by nurses and hospitals, it is unlikely that nurse documentation of patient status will increase. However, further study is needed about how documentation relates to quality of care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.