Clinician Specialty and Treatment Style for Depressed Outpatients with and Without Medical Comorbidities

Published in: Archives of Family Medicine, v. 3, no. 12, Dec. 1994, p. 1065-1072

by Lisa S. Meredith, Kenneth B. Wells, Patricia Camp

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Presents data on the treatments received by over 2,000 depressed patients enrolled in the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) and the 470 clinicians who treated them. It uses multivariate analysis to compare the treatment styles (counseling and prescribing antidepressants) of family physicians with those of psychiatrists, medical subspecialists, internists, psychologists, and other therapists for depressed patients with various medical comorbidities. Based on physician surveys, the study concluded that, among primary care specialists, family physicians showed the strongest preferences for both counseling and prescribing antidepressants for depressed patients. In fact, family physicians reported preferences for treatment with antidepressants that were similar to preferences reported by psychiatrists. In actual practice, however, medication use was higher among the patients of psychiatrists than among those of family physicians. Mental health care specialists reported the strongest counseling preferences and provided the most counseling in actual practice, compared with all general medicine physicians. The article concludes that measures of clinical treatment style for depression are good proxies for counseling but not for prescribing practices. To improve care for patients with depression, it will be necessary to change physicians' preferences regarding treatment and counseling and, at the same time, make sure that preferences regarding treatment are carried out in actual practice.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.