Identifying Modifiable Risk Factors for Rehospitalization

A Case-Control Study of Seriously Mentally Ill Persons in Mississippi

Published In: American Journal of Psychiatry, v. 152, no. 12, Dec. 1, 1995, p. 1749-1756

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1995

by Greer Sullivan, Kenneth B. Wells, Hal Morgenstern, Barbara Leake

Read More

Access further information on this document at ajp.psychiatryonline.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors used a case-control design to identify risk factors for rehospitalization in a seriously mentally ill population in rural Mississippi. The study focused on factors that have the potential for modification through community-based interventions. Most of the patients had schizophrenia, and all had been hospitalized at least once for a serious mental condition. Data were collected from structured interviews of subjects and informants (mostly family members), as well as direct observation. The study found that medication noncompliance, comorbid alcohol abuse, and a high level of criticism from informants were associated with greater risk for rehospitalization, while risk factors traditionally used in medical research use of outpatient services, access to care, quality of life, and some demographic variables (including ethnicity and gender)--were not. The findings imply that interventions targeted at improving medication compliance, reducing alcohol abuse, and helping families cope with the mentally ill could reduce the risk of rehospitalization in this population.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.