Assessing the Quality of Care for Children

Prospects Under Health Reform

Published In: Archives of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, v. 149, no. 4, Apr. 1995, p. 359-368

Posted on on December 31, 1994

by Elizabeth A. McGlynn, Neal Halfon, Arleen Leibowitz

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Although considerable work has been done in developing methods and tools for assessing quality of care for adults, less work has been done on children's health care. This article discusses the quality of care delivered to children. Although federal health care reform legislation has not been enacted, efforts continue to reduce costs, increase access, and improve quality. This first article suggests several methodological strategies for assessing quality of care for children, including aggregating across services for several conditions, examining access and appropriateness of care, developing generic measures of children's health status sufficiently sensitive to distinguish sick from well children and among levels of severity, and linking outcome measures and variations in process. If publicly accountable measures are to be developed to assess quality of care for children, especially in managed care plans, two possible methodological problems need to be addressed: playing to the measures (i.e., health plans emphasize the care they know is being monitored) and gaming (i.e., putting the best light on data collection by manipulating sample frames, denominators, and techniques of data gathering).

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.