Medical Schools, the Social Contract and Population Medicine

McMaster Revisited

Published In: Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, v. 18, no. 8, 1995, p. 554-558

Posted on on January 01, 1995

by Ian D. Coulter, Michael Wilkes

Offers provocative comments on the challenges faced by medical and chiropractic schools in meeting two goals: a return to the social contract that traditionally characterized academic medicine and the community, and a return to population-based medicine as a mechanism for fulfilling this contract. These two goals are discussed in terms of the experience of McMaster University (Ontario, Canada). The lessons learned from the McMaster experience are especially useful to the practice of medicine in the United States as physicians continue to enter into systems of managed care. McMaster was created in an environment receptive to regionalization and the practice of population-based medicine. These external forces do not exist in the United States, and thus U.S. medical schools face a different challenge from that of McMaster--i.e., to transform education while having no option of altering the health care delivery system. The question for U.S. medical education is whether the paradigm by which medicine is taught can be changed, given the more difficult external environment.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.