Measuring Physical Function in Community-Dwelling Older Persons

A Comparison of Self-Administered, Interviewer-Administered, and Performance-Based Measures

Published In: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v. 43, Jan. 1995, p. 17-23

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1995

by David Reuben, Laurie Valle, Ron D. Hays, Albert L. Siu

Compares two self- administered, two interviewer-administered, and one performance-based measure of physical functioning in community-based older persons. All 83 study participants completed by self-administration the Functional Status Questionnaire (FSQ) and the SF-36; by interview, the Katz Activities of Daily Living questionnaire and the Older Americans Resources and Services Instrumental Activities of Daily Living questionnaire; and by direct activity, the Physician Performance Test. Correlations between the FSQ and SF-36 were higher than between the self-administered and interviewer-administered or performance-based measures. Based on a number of correlation comparisons, the authors conclude that relationships among commonly used self- administered, interviewer administered, and performance-based measures of physical function are inconsistent and weak, suggesting that these instruments are not measuring the same construct. It is unclear which instrument is more valid, and the authors suggest that a combination of instruments may produce the best sense of the patient's functioning.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.