The Cost Effectiveness of Preoperative Autologous Blood Donations

Published In: New England Journal of Medicine, v. 332, no. 11, Mar. 16 1995, p. 719-724

by Jeff A. Etchason, Lawrence D. Petz, Emmett B. Keeler, Loni Calhoun, Steven Kleinman, Cynthia Snider, Arlene Fink, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at content.nejm.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

A patient makes an autologous blood donation prior to surgery so that his or her blood can be reinfused if it is needed during surgery. The value of this process is that the patient does not receive someone else's blood, which could conceivably carry a contagious disease. A decision-analysis model assessed the cost-effectiveness of donating autologous blood for four surgical interventions. Results indicated that substituting autologous for community blood resulted in little expected health benefits at considerable additional cost. The additional cost was primarily a function of discarding the units that were donated but not transfused and of a more labor-intensive donation process (autologous donors are typically less healthy than regular donors, and so take longer to give blood). The authors conclude that, given the improved safety of allogeneic transfusions, the increased protection afforded by donating autologous blood is limited and may not justify the increased cost.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.