Enumerating Homeless People

Alternative Strategies and Their Consequences

Published in: Evaluation Review, v. 20, no. 4, Aug. 1996, p. 378-403

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1996

by Paul Koegel, M. Audrey Burnam, Sally C. Morton

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sagepub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Decisions about how inclusive one should be in attempting to sample and/or enumerate homeless populations are best guided by information regarding what is sacrificed when different sampling choices are made. This article draws upon data from the Course of Homeless Study to explore how three progressively less inclusive sampling frames affect understandings of the size and characteristics of homeless populations in two Los Angeles sites. Findings suggest that less inclusive sampling frames substantially affect population estimates, but do not consistently produce biased estimates of population characteristics. Whether, and the extent to which, such bias is introduced varies by site, by, gender, and by the population characteristics in question.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.