Potential Impact of Restricting STD/HIV Care for Immigrants in Los Angeles County

Published in: International Journal of STD & AIDS, v. 7, Nov./Dec. 1996, p. 532-535

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1996

by Steven M. Asch, Sara Rulnick, Cheri Todoroff, Gary A. Richwald

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ingentaconnect.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Legislative restrictions in immigrants' access to health care and local governmental funding shortfalls in the U.S. and Western Europe have raised fears that public clinic patients might delay care for communicable diseases. To help quantify the potential impact of both policies on public clinics providing sexually transmitted disease (STD) services, the authors surveyed 234 patients from five L.A. Clinics regarding their alternative sources of health care. Of the 215 providing complete information (response rate=91%), 52 (24%) reported they had no legal rights to reside in the U.S. Compared to the legal resident control group, illegal immigrants were more likely to indicate that they had no alternative access to medical care (27% vs. 44%). The authors conclude that for a substantial proportion of patients, particularly illegal immigrants, the STD clinics are indeed essential. Restricting access to these clinics may have unpredictable public health consequences.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.