Recidivism in Child Protective Services

Published In: Children and Youth Services Review, v. 19, no. 3, 1997, p. 139-161

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1997

by Moira Inkelas, Neal Halfon

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.sciencedirect.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Uses data from a survey conducted by the California Department of Social Services to examine the extent of recidivism in child protective case openings in California and the factors associated with it. These data indicate that recidivism is common and growing over time in California's child protective system. Nearly half of the cases investigated in 1993 by the system's Emergency Response component had previous case openings, a 55 percent increase since 1985. Moreover, the average number of previous case openings was higher among discharged cases in 1993 than in 1985. Nearly two-thirds of these cases were discharged after the assessment process, even though maltreatment was substantiated in nearly half of the cases in which discharge occurred, suggesting that recidivism is not a function of reports of unfounded abuse. This discharge generally occurred within 21 days, with few children or their families receiving needed medical or social services or referral to other services. The high level of recidivism may indicate that potentially vulnerable children are being returned to high-risk environments without sufficient services to reduce risk, although it is also possible that a growing number or children hover at a risk level that is just above the threshold for intervention. In either event, better coordination of crisis-oriented services with other ongoing assistance programs and better in-depth assessments of the risks and health conditions of children entering the child welfare system are needed.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.