Comparison of a Generic to Disease-Targeted Health-Related Quality-of-Life Measures for Multiple Sclerosis

Published In: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 50, no. 5, May 1997, p. 557-569

Posted on on January 01, 1997

by Barbara Vickrey, Ron D. Hays, Barbara Genovese, Lawrence W. Myers, George W. Ellison

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Deals with the comparison of a generic measure to a disease-targeted health-related quality-of-life measure for multiple sclerosis. The article is based on data obtained from 171 adults with multiple sclerosis, and compares a generic measure and a disease-targeted instrument. The major conclusion of this study is that results indicate that the disease-targeted scales provide unique information not captured by the generic measures. If a generic measure of health-related quality of life is desirable for a given study of multiple sclerosis, additional information will be gained by supplementing that measure with selected scales. The results of this study are consistent with studies from other diseases suggesting that when measuring health-related quality of life, one should supplement generic measures with disease-specific measures to get a full assessment of the impact of a therapy on health-related quality of life.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.