Understanding Changes in Health Status

Is the Floor Phenomenon Merely the Last Step of the Staircase?

Published In: Medical Care, v. 35, no. 1, Jan. 1997, p. 1-15

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 1997

by David William Baker, Ron D. Hays, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at journals.lww.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This methodologic article provides new insight into changes in health status. The data were obtained from about 1,000 patients completing health status questionnaires at the time of presenting to the emergency department of a public hospital. The findings from this study suggest that the sensitivity of health status measures to change and the meaning of an incremental change in physical health or mental health vary depending on baseline health. This may result from noninterval properties of response options or from patients being at the lowest health state (the floor) of individual questions. If health status measures similar to this are to be used to compare the outcomes of treatment across diseases and for patients in a wide variety of baseline health states, weighting schemes may be needed to account for these effects. This methodologic piece indicates that more work is needed to increase the validity and the meaning of changes in health status scores when the usual types of health status scales are used to assess health status.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.