Indications for and Outcomes of Cholecystectomy

A Comparison of the Pre and Postlaparoscopic Eras

Published in: Annals of Surgery, v. 227, no. 3, Mar. 1998, p. 343-350

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 1997

by Judy A. Shea, Jesse A. Berlin, Dale R. Bachwich, Rudolf N Staroscik, Peter F. Malet, Maryanne McGuckin, J. Sanford Schwartz, Jose J. Escarce

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.annalsofsurgery.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The purpose of this study was to examine changing patient characteristics and surgical outcomes for patients undergoing cholecystectomy at five community hospitals in 1989 and 1993. In a retrospective chart review, data were gathered regarding gallstone disease severity, type of admission, patient age, number of comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification, length of stay, and multiple outcomes surgery. What the authors found is that the volume of nonincidental cholecystectomies increased 26 per cent, from 1611 in 1989 to 2031 in 1993. Nearly all of the increase occurred among patients with uncomplicated cholelithiasis and with elective admissions. In 1993, lengths of stay were significantly shorter and percentages of complications were significantly lower for infectious, cardiac, pulmonary, and gastrointestinal complications when controlling for patient case-mix characteristics. There were more major intraoperative complications (unintended wounds or injuries to the common bile duct, bowel, blood vessel(s), or other organs) in 1993. The authors conclude that different types of patients underwent cholecystectomy in 1993 compared with patients in 1989, which supports the hypothesis of changing thresholds. Statements supporting the safety of cholecystectomy in the laparoscopic era were borne out when controlling for differences in patient characteristics.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.