Assessing the Predictive Validity of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method Criteria for Performing Carotid Endarterectomy

Paul G. Shekelle, Mark R. Chassin, Rolla Edward Park

ResearchPosted on rand.org 1998Published in: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, v. 14, no. 4, Fall 1998, p. 707-727

The authors assessed the predictive validity of an expert panel's ratings of the appropriateness of carotid endarterectomy by comparing ratings to the results of subsequent randomized clinical trials. They found the trials confirmed the ratings for 44 indications (covering almost 30% of operations performed in 1981) and refuted the ratings for none.

Read More

Topics

Document Details

  • Copyright: Cambridge University Press
  • Publisher: Cambridge University Press
  • Availability: Non-RAND
  • Year: 1998
  • Pages: 20
  • Document Number: EP-199809-02

This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.