Cover: Differential Patterns of Mental Disorders Among the Homeless in Madrid (Spain) and Los Angeles (USA)

Differential Patterns of Mental Disorders Among the Homeless in Madrid (Spain) and Los Angeles (USA)

Published in: Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, v. 33, no. 10, Oct. 1998, p. 514-520

Posted on 1998

by Manuel Munoz, Carmelo Vazquez Valverde, Paul Koegel, Jesus Sanz, M. Audrey Burnam

In this paper the authors compare rates of mental disorders (major depression, dysthymia, cognitive impairment, and schizophrenia) among homeless people in Madrid and Los Angeles (LA) and examine the ordering of the onset of both conditions (i.e., homelessness and mental disorders). In the Madrid study, 262 homeless persons were interviewed using the CIDI. In the LA study, 1563 homeless persons were interviewed with the DIS. To make an item-by-item comparison, the authors combined the databases from both studies to submit a single database to statistical analyses. Results showed no significant differences in DSM-III-R life-time prevalence rates of mental disorders between both samples. However, the Madrid sample showed higher 12-month prevalence rates of dysthymia and cognitive impairment as compared to the LA sample. Most subjects across both cities first experienced symptoms of their mental disorders before first becoming homeless. The only significant difference was that all of the depressed adults in Madrid experienced depression prior to first becoming homeless, whereas this was the case for only 59.1% of LA depressed homeless people. The authors discuss the reasons for these cultural differences and their implications for cross-national public health research and intervention.

This report is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.