Association of Dialyzer Reuse with Hospitalization and Survival Rates Among U.S. Hemodialysis Patients

Do Comorbidities Matter?

Published in: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, v. 52, no. 3, Mar. 1999, p. 209-217

Posted on on January 01, 1999

by Harold I. Feldman, Warren B. Bilker, Monica Hackett, Christopher W. Simmons, John H. Holmes, Mark V. Pauly, Jose J. Escarce

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The objective of this study was to determine whether the associations between reuse of hemodialyzers and higher rates of death and hospitalization persist after adjustment for comorbidity. The study was a nonconcurrent cohort analysis of survival and hospitalization rates among 1491 U.S. chronic hemodialysis patients beginning treatment in 1986 and 1987. The impact of dialyzer reuse was compared across three survival models: an unadjusted model, a base model adjusted only for demographics and renal diagnosis, and an augmented model additionally adjusted for comorbidities. The authors found that reuse of dialyzers was associated with a similarly higher rate of death in analyses unadjusted for confounders, adjusted for demographics and renal diagnosis, and adjusted for comorbidities. Reusing dialyzers was also associated with a greater rate of hospitalization that was stable regardless of adjustment procedures. They conclude that higher rates of death and hospitalization associated with dialyzer reuse persist regardless of adjustment for demographic characteristics or baseline comorbidities. These findings amplify concerns that there is elevated morbidity among hemodialysis patients treated in facilities that reuse hemodialyzers. Although the association we observed was not confounded by comorbidity, a cause-and-effect relationship between dialyzer reuse and morbidity could not be proved because of the inability to control for aspects of care other than dialyzer reuse.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.