Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Urinary Tract Infection in Adults with Spinal Cord Dysfunction

Published in: Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine, v. 22, no. 4, Winter 1999, p. 258–272

by Paul G. Shekelle, Sally C. Morton, Kenneth A. Clark, Mayank Pathak, Barbara Vickrey

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Recurrent urinary tract infections (UTIs) occur frequently in persons with neurogenic bladders due to spinal cord dysfunction, resulting in increased morbidity and cost. The authors conducted a systematic review to identify risk factors for UTI using controlled clinical trials, cohort, and cross-sectional studies that assessed risk factors for UTI and included bacteriuria or UTI as an outcome. Twenty-two studies met the inclusion criteria. Quality assessment revealed important methodological deficiencies. Two studies provide evidence supporting increased bladder residual volume as a risk factor. Most of the retrieved studies investigated method of drainage with the consistent finding that persons using intermittent catheterization had fewer infections than those with indwelling catheters. There is conflicting evidence over the value of sterile or no touch catheter techniques compared with clean intermittent catheterization. There is insufficient evidence to assess risk due to psychosocial, behavioral, and hygiene factors; sex; level of function; and time since injury.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.