Identifying a Short Functional Disability Screen for Older Persons

Published in: Journal of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, v. 55, no. 12, 2000, p. M750-M756

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2000

by Debra Saliba, Maria Orlando Edelen, Neil S. Wenger, Ron D. Hays, Laurence Rubenstein

Read More

Access further information on this document at biomed.gerontologyjournals.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND: Disability in instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) or activities of daily living (ADLs) is an indicator of health risk. The inclusion of these items in population screens may be limited by variation in item performance across gender and age groups. Further, identification of shortened lists may encourage inclusion of these items in screens. METHODS: The authors applied item response theory (IRT) methods to assess the responses of 9865 community-dwelling elders in the 1993 Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey to 11 IADL/ADL items. Items were classified as receive help/not receive help for the overall population and stratified by age and gender. They assessed the same IADL/ADL items using responses classified as difficulty/no difficulty. After eliminating items that performed poorly, they performed all-subsets analyses to identify abbreviated sets of items that would select the highest proportion of persons with IADL/ADL disability. RESULTS: Responses classified in receive help format showed consistency by gender and age group. Changing the response classification to difficulty/no difficulty influenced the reported order and relationship of IADL/ADL items. Receipt of help for any one of five items--shopping, doing light housework, walking, bathing, or managing finances--identified 93% of individuals receiving help with any IADL/ADL. A slightly different set of five items--walking, shopping, transferring, doing light housework, or bathing--identified 91% of persons reporting difficulty with any IADL or ADL. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship of IADL and ADL items to the underlying construct of disability was similar for men and women. The relationship was also similar for oldest-old and younger-old individuals. This study also identified abbreviated lists of disability items that can be used to efficiently screen community-dwelling elders for the presence of IADL/ADL disability.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.