Likelihood-based Item-Fit Indices for Dichotomous Item Response Theory Models

Published in: Applied Psychological Measurement, v. 24, no. 1, Mar. 2000, p. 50-64

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2000

by Maria Orlando Edelen, David Thissen

Read More

Access further information on this document at apm.sagepub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

New goodness-of-fit indices are introduced for dichotomous item response theory (IRT) models. These indices are based on the likelihoods of number-correct scores derived from the IRT model, and they provide a direct comparison of the modeled and observed frequencies for correct and incorrect responses for each number-correct score. The behavior of Pearson's X2 (S-X2) and the likelihood ratio G2 (S-G2) was assessed in a simulation study and compared with two fit indices similar to those currently in use (Q1 -X2 and Q1 -G2). The simulations included three conditions in which the simulating and fitting models were identical and three conditions involving model misspecification. S-X2 performed well, with Type I error rates close to the expected .05 and.01 levels. Performance of this index improved with increased test length. S-G2 tended to reject the null hypothesis too often, as did Q1 -X2 and Q1 -G2. The power Of S-X2 appeared to be similar for all test lengths, but varied depending on the type of model misspecification.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.