
Dying with End Stage Liver Disease with Cirrhosis
Insights from SUPPORT
Published in: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v. 48, no. 5, suppl., May 2000, p. S122-S130
Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2000
OBJECTIVES: To understand patterns of care and end-of-life preferences for patients dying with end stage liver disease with cirrhosis (ESLDC). METHODS: Data were collected during the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), a prospective cohort study of seriously ill hospitalized adults at five teaching hospitals in the United States, and included all patients enrolled in SUPPORT with ESLDC. RESULTS: Of 575 patients with ESLDC, 166 died during index hospitalization, and 168 died in the following year. The majority were male (65%) and white (80%); the median age was 52 years. Most rated their quality of life as poor or fair, and multiple comorbidities were common. Most spent their last few days completely disabled. Families often reported loss of most income and the need to leave work or other activities in order to care for patients. Pain was at least moderately severe most of the time in one-third of patients. End-of-life preferences were not associated with survival. Most patients (66.8%) preferred CPR, but DNR orders and orders against ventilator use increased near death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with liver disease were young, likely to be male, and often had low incomes. The high burden of pain was comparable to that reported for patients with lung and colon cancer. Persons dying with liver disease may benefit from increased attention to relief of symptoms, improved home care, and advanced care planning.
This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.