Dying with End Stage Liver Disease with Cirrhosis

Insights from SUPPORT

Published in: Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, v. 48, no. 5, suppl., May 2000, p. S122-S130

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2000

by Katalin Eve Roth, Joanne Lynn, Zhenshao Zhong, Marie L. Borum, Neal V. Dawson

OBJECTIVES: To understand patterns of care and end-of-life preferences for patients dying with end stage liver disease with cirrhosis (ESLDC). METHODS: Data were collected during the Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment (SUPPORT), a prospective cohort study of seriously ill hospitalized adults at five teaching hospitals in the United States, and included all patients enrolled in SUPPORT with ESLDC. RESULTS: Of 575 patients with ESLDC, 166 died during index hospitalization, and 168 died in the following year. The majority were male (65%) and white (80%); the median age was 52 years. Most rated their quality of life as poor or fair, and multiple comorbidities were common. Most spent their last few days completely disabled. Families often reported loss of most income and the need to leave work or other activities in order to care for patients. Pain was at least moderately severe most of the time in one-third of patients. End-of-life preferences were not associated with survival. Most patients (66.8%) preferred CPR, but DNR orders and orders against ventilator use increased near death. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with liver disease were young, likely to be male, and often had low incomes. The high burden of pain was comparable to that reported for patients with lung and colon cancer. Persons dying with liver disease may benefit from increased attention to relief of symptoms, improved home care, and advanced care planning.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.