Mental Health Parity and Employer-Sponsored Health Insurance in 1999-2000

Published in: Psychiatric Services, v. 51, no. 11, Nov. 2000, p. 1361

Posted on on January 01, 2000

by Roland Sturm, Rosalie Liccardo Pacula

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The most problematic differences in insurance benefits are limits in coverage because plans with limits partially insure individuals against smaller expenses but leave them at full risk for high expenses that exceed the limit. Limits protect the insurer against high costs, not the individual. The authors examined whether mental health benefits have changed markedly since parity legislation was enacted. They analyzed preliminary data from the employer survey in the Health Care for Communities study, including responses from July 1999 through July 2000.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.