Tracking Managed Care

The Importance of a Cash Incentive for Medical Director Response to a Survey

Published In: American Journal of Managed Care, Vol. 6, no. 11, Nov. 2000, p. 1209-1214

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2000

by Jennifer Malin, Jeffrey Rideout, Patricia A. Ganz

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ajmc.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the impact of a monetary incentive in a survey mailed to medical directors of large medical groups and independent practice associations (IPAs). STUDY DESIGN: Mailed survey. METHODS: The authors mailed a survey to the medical directors of all medical groups and IPAs contracted with Blue Cross California Care, a large California managed care health plan (n = 174). After 2 mailings without any monetary incentive, they included a $50 bill in the third mailing to increase the response rate. RESULTS: Only 46 medical directors responded to the first and second mailings (response rates of 17% and 13%, respectively). The third mailing, which included a $50 bill attached to the front of the survey, yielded 78 responses (66%), for an overall total of 124 (76%). They found no significant differences in the physician organizations of medical directors who responded to the mailing with the $50 incentive compared with the physician organizations of those who responded to 1 of the first 2 mailings, although medical directors who responded without the financial incentive were more likely to report that their organization had staff for quality assurance (96% vs 82%; P < or = .03). CONCLUSION: Including a $50 bill improved the rate of response to a survey mailed to medical directors from 13%-17% to 66%.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.