Urinary Function and Bother After Radical Prostatectomy or Radiation for Prostate Cancer

A Longitudinal, Multivariate Quality of Life Analysis from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor

Published in: The Journal of Urology, v. 164, no. 6, Dec. 2000, p. 1973-1977

by Mark Litwin, David J. Pasta, Jenny Yu, Marcia L. Stoddard, Scott C. Flanders

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.jurology.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

PURPOSE: The authors measure the effect of time on urinary function and bother during the first 2 years following treatment for early stage prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors studied urinary function and bother in 564 men recently diagnosed with early stage prostate cancer and treated with radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the UCLA Prostate Cancer Index, which is a validated, health related quality of life instrument that includes these 2 domains. To minimize the influence of other factors they adjusted for age, co-morbidity, general health, pad use, anticholinergics or procedures for urethral stricture. All subjects were drawn from the Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor (CaPSURE), which is a national longitudinal database. RESULTS: Urinary function improved with time during the first year after surgery but remained fairly constant during year 2. Urinary function remained stable throughout the 2 years after radiation. Urinary bother was worse after radiation throughout the 2 years, although it improved markedly by the end of year 1. Age, ethnicity and co-morbidity did not impact urinary function or bother but being married did have an advantage. CONCLUSIONS: Patients undergoing surgery or radiation showed different longitudinal profiles of urinary function and bother during the first 2 years after treatment.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.