Missing in Action

The Public Health Voice in Policy Debates

Published in: Journal of Public Health Management Practice, v. 7, no. 3, Editorial, May 2001, p. ix-x

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2001

by Peter Jacobson, Jeffrey Wasserman

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.jphmp.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors describe some of their case studies conducted across two public health domains, tobacco control and youth violence prevention, and discuss some findings in common that could serve as lessons to why the public voice, which is critical in facilitating public health outcomes, appears to be absent in state-level policy-making debates.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/research-integrity.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.