Mind-body Interventions for Gastrointestinal Conditions

Published in: Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 40 (Prepared by Southern California/RAND Evidence-Based Practice Center, under Contract No. 290-97-0001). AHRQ Publication No. 01-E027. (Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Mar. 2001), 4 p

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2001

by Ian D. Coulter, Mary L. Hardy, Joya T. Favreau, Pamela D. Elfenbaum, Sally C. Morton, Beth Roth, Barbara Genovese, Paul G. Shekelle

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.ahrq.gov

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The idea that physical processes in the body can be influenced by emotional factors, that the mind and body are connected, has distinguished modern western (allopathic) attitudes about health and the practice of medicine from most others throughout history. So-called mind-body interventions have been applied to conditions affecting every part of the body. The goal of the first SCEPC NCCAM evidence report was to provide a comprehensive review of the use of mind-body interventions for the treatment of one condition or a review of one mind-body modality. METHODOLOGY: A panel of technical experts representing diverse disciplines advised the researchers throughout the course of the study. A broad search of the literature revealed a sufficient number of comparative treatment studies on the use of mind-body interventions to treat gastrointestinal (GI) conditions to warrant a review. Interventions for which no comparative treatment studies could be identified were omitted. The literature search, screening, review, and data gathering process were performed using techniques developed by the SCEPC for evidence reports. Data were collected using special screening forms designed for the study. OUTCOMES: Interpretation of the results of trials of mind-body interventions for GI conditions was seriously hampered by methodological problems. Results of the small number of methodologically acceptable studies provided limited evidence for an effect of behavioral, cognitive, guided imagery, and relaxation techniques for the treatment of GI problems in adults, however no conclusions could be drawn about the use of hypnotherapy. Results of biofeedback interventions in adults were mixed, whereas the technique appears ineffective for children.

Research conducted by

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.