Understanding the Causal Relationship Between Patient-Reported Interpersonal and Technical Quality of Care for Depression

Published in: Medical Care, v. 40, no. 8, Aug. 2002, p. 696-704

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2002

by Maria Orlando Edelen, Lisa S. Meredith

Read More

Access further information on this document at journals.lww.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: Patient ratings of their health care experience have become increasingly important as indicators of interpersonal quality of care. Currently the link between technical and interpersonal quality of care indicators is not well understood. The goal of this study was to examine the temporal relationship between technical quality of care for depression and interpersonal quality of care by examining their association over time. METHODS: A cross-lagged (longitudinal) path analytic model was estimated to examine the causal relationship between two measures of interpersonal quality of care and technical quality of care among 697 respondents participating in the 18 and 24 month assessments of Partners in Care (PIC). Measures of age, gender, number of chronic diseases, indicators of anxiety and depression, recent service utilization, and stability of the doctor-patient relationship were included as covariates. RESULTS: After controlling for study design and relevant patient characteristics, one significant cross-lagged effect was found: that from one measure of interpersonal quality (patient satisfaction) to technical quality (standardized coefficient = 0.18), but not from quality to satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Results of these analyses indicate that patients who report high satisfaction with care are more likely to receive higher technical quality depression care 6 months later as compared with those who are less satisfied. This implies that one pathway to improving technical quality of care may be through increasing patients, satisfaction.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.