Preoperative Prevalence of Barrett's Esophagus in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

A Systematic Review

Published in: Gastroenterology, v. 122, no. 1, Jan. 2002, p. 26-33

Posted on on January 01, 2002

by Gareth S. Dulai, Sushovan Guha, Katherine L. Kahn, Jeffrey Gornbein, Wilfred M. Weinstein

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The public health impact of past screening and surveillance practices on the outcomes of Barrett's related cancers has not previously been quantified. Our purpose was to determine the prior prevalence of Barrett's esophagus in reported cases of incident adenocarcinoma undergoing resection, as an indirect measure of impact. METHODS: The authors performed a systematic review of the literature from 1966 to 2000. Studies were included if they reported: (1) the number of consecutive adenocarcinomas resected, and (2) the number of those resected who had a previously known diagnosis of Barrett's. They generated summary estimates using a random effects model. RESULTS: The authors identified and reviewed 752 studies. Twelve studies representing a total of 1503 unique cases of resected adenocarcinomas met inclusion criteria. Using a random effects model, the overall percentage of patients undergoing resection who had a prior diagnosis of Barrett's was 4.7% +/- 2.9%. CONCLUSIONS: The low prior prevalence (approximately 5%) of Barrett's esophagus in this study population provides indirect evidence to suggest that recent efforts to identify patients with Barrett's--whether through endoscopic screening or evaluation of symptomatic patients--have had minimal public health impact on esophageal adenocarcinoma outcomes. The potential benefits of endoscopic surveillance seem to have been limited to only a fraction of those individuals at risk. These data thus provide a clear and compelling rationale for the development of effective screening strategies to identify patients with Barrett's esophagus.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.