Using Survey Measures to Assess Risk Selection Among Medicare Managed Care Plans

Published in: Inquiry, v. 39, no. 2, Summer 2002, p. 138-151

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2002

by Alan M. Zaslavsky, Melinda Beeuwkes Buntin

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.inquiryjournal.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

This paper quantifies risk selection among competing Medicare managed care plans, using beneficiary survey data from the Consumer Assessments of Health Plans Survey. Selection, measured by variation in plan-level prevalence of health conditions and predicted costs, was substantial. A plan with moderate (one standard deviation) adverse selection would have predicted costs 11.6% above an average plan. Only a small part of this variation was explained by the geographical differences in the prevalence of health conditions among or within Metropolitan Statistical Areas, indicating that the selection was driven by plan attributes. Plans serving members with greater health needs have the potential to establish programs to serve these sick members well, yet this places plans at financial risk. Hence, improved risk adjustment for chronic conditions may be warranted. Moreover, survey measures have the potential to measure the prevalence of such conditions reliably and consistently across plans.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.