Visual Acuity Following Cataract Surgeries in Relation to Preoperative Appropriateness Ratings

Published in: Medical Decision Making, v. 23, no. 2, Mar-Apr. 2003, p. 122-130

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2003

by Joanne Tobacman, Bridget Zimmerman, Paul Lee, Lee H. Hilborne, Hansjoerg Kolder, Robert H. Brook

Read More

Access further information on this document at mdm.sagepub.com

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The authors initiated this study to consider if the formal preoperative assessment of appropriate or inappropriate utilization of cataract surgery by an expert panel could predict postoperative improvement or decline in visual acuity. They evaluated the association between ratings of appropriateness, as determined by the RAND-UCLA method, and measurements of postoperative visual acuity using Fisher's exact tests for tables greater than 2 x 2. For 768 patients, improvement of at least 2 Snellen chart lines occurred in 89% of surgeries rated as appropriate or appropriate and crucial, 68% rated as uncertain, and 36% rated as inappropriate (P < 0.0001, Fisher's exact test). These results provide evidence supporting the validity of the RAND-UCLA method to assess the appropriateness of surgery.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.