Assessing Usual Care in Clinical Trials of Adherence Interventions for Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy

Published in: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes, v. 33, no. 2, Letters to the Editor, June 1, 2003, p. 276-277

Posted on on January 01, 2003

by Glenn Wagner, David E. Kanouse

Read More

Access further information on this document at Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Despite the absence of empirical evidence, serious mental illness is assumed to be a high risk factor for nonadherence to HIV antiretroviral regimens. To assess antiretroviral adherence among persons with serious mental illness, the authors conducted a study in which adherence was observed over a 2-week period with electronic monitoring bottle caps and self-report. Forty-seven participants enrolled, with all but two (96%) completing the study. Psychiatric diagnoses included bipolar depression (n=24), schizophrenia (n=12), schizoaffective disorder (n=5), and major depression with psychotic features (n=6). Mean adherence (proportion of prescribed doses taken) was 66% (SD=34), as measured by electronic monitoring; 40% demonstrated at least 90% adherence, but 31 % had less than 50% adherence. Self-reported adherence to psychotropics was moderately correlated with self-reported (r = .45, p < .05) and electronically monitored (r = .39, p < .05) antiretroviral adherence. Viral load (log10) was negatively correlated with electronically monitored (r = -.28, p < .10) and self-reported (r = -.39, p < .05) antiretroviral adherence, after controlling for the length of time on treatment. These findings suggest that many patients with serious mental illness are able to adhere very well to antiretroviral regimens, yet a substantial proportion of our sample displayed poor adherence, indicating the need for research to further assess the factors that influence adherence to antiretrovirals in this population.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.