Patterns of Care for Open-Angle Glaucoma in Managed Care

Published in: Archives of Ophthalmology, v. 121, no. 6, June 2003, p. 777-783

Posted on RAND.org on January 01, 2003

by Allen Fremont, Paul Lee, Carol Mangione, Kanika Kapur, John L. Adams, Steven L. Wickstrom, Jose J. Escarce

Read More

Access further information on this document at archopht.ama-assn.org

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns of care for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and assess conformance with the American Academy of Ophthalmology's Preferred Practice Pattern (PPP). METHODS: The authors obtained administrative, survey, and eye care records data on 395 working-age patients with POAG enrolled in 6 managed care plans between 1997 and 1999. They assessed processes of care at the initial and follow-up visits, control of intraocular pressure (IOP), intervals between visits and visual field tests, and adjustments in therapy. RESULTS: The authors found high rates of performance on most recommended processes during initial evaluations, although only 53% of patients received an optic nerve head photograph or drawing and only 1% had a target IOP level documented. Recommended processes were performed at 80% to 97% of follow-up visits. Using loose criteria for control, IOP was controlled in 66% of follow-up visits for patients with mild glaucoma and 52% of visits for patients with moderate to severe glaucoma. Intervals between visits and visual field tests were generally consistent with PPP recommendations. Adjustments in therapy were more likely with worse control of IOP, although adjustments occurred in only half of visits where the IOP was 30 mm Hg or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Their study suggests that, in many respects, patients with POAG are receiving care that is consistent with the PPP. However, care is falling short on several key aspects, and POAG may be undertreated relative to standards for IOP control established in recent clinical trials.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.