Use of Mental Health Services by Men Injured Through Community Violence

Published in: Psychiatric Services, v. 55, no. 4, Apr. 2004, p. 415-420

Posted on on January 01, 2004

by Lisa H. Jaycox, Grant N. Marshall, Terry L. Schell

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the use of mental health services and predictors of use among men injured through community violence. METHODS: This one-year prospective study examined use of mental health services in a sample of 231 men who were injured through community violence and hospitalized at an urban trauma center. Predictors of mental health service use that were examined included age, ethnicity, income, neuroticism, injury severity, previous mental health service use, and need for services. Need for services was defined objectively by self-report of symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and subjectively by perception of an injury-related emotional problem. RESULTS: Univariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age, non-Latino ethnicity, previous use of services, and need for services predicted service use in the year after the injury. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, objective and subjective need for services and older age predicted postinjury service use. In the subset of men who were symptomatic postinjury, only older age and objective need predicted use of mental health services. CONCLUSIONS: Despite high rates of need for services related to PTSD after violent injury in this sample, the rate of mental health service use was low. Psychoeducation about postinjury reactions and attention to structural barriers to services may help increase rates of care in this population.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.