Cost-effectiveness of Interventions for Depressed Latinos

Published In: Journal of Mental Health Policy and Economics, v. 7, no. 2, May 30, 2004, p. 69-76

Posted on on January 01, 2004

by Michael Schoenbaum, Jeanne Miranda, Cathy D. Sherbourne, Naihua Duan, Kenneth B. Wells

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

CONTEXT: Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide, but treatment rates are low, particularly for minority patients. OBJECTIVE: To estimated societal cost-effectiveness of two interventions to improve care for depression in primary care, examining Latino and white patients separately. METHODS: Intent-to-treat analysis of data from a group-level controlled trial, in which matched primary care clinics in the US were randomized to usual care or to one of two interventions designed to increase the rate of effective depression treatment. One intervention facilitated medication management (``QI-Meds'') and the other psychotherapy (QI-Therapy''); but patients and clinicians could choose the type of treatment, or none. The study involved 46 clinics in 6 non-academic, managed care organizations; 181 primary care providers; and 398 Latino and 778 White patients with current depression. Outcomes are health care costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALY), depression burden, employment, and costs per QALY, over 24 months of follow-up. RESULTS: Relative to usual care, QI-Therapy resulted in significantly fewer depression burden days for Latinos and increased days employed for white patients. Average health care costs increased $278 in QI-Meds and $161 in QI-Therapy for Latinos, and by $655 in QI-Meds and $752 in QI-Therapy for whites, relative to usual care. The estimated cost per QALY for Latinos was $6,100 or less under QI-Therapy, but $90,000 or more in QI-Meds. For Whites, estimated costs per QALY were around $30,000 under both interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Latinos benefit from improved care for depression, and the cost is less than that for white patients. Diverse patients are likely to benefit from improving care for depression in primary care.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.