20 Years of Progress

Published in: Medical Care, Vol. 42, No. 6, June 2004, Editorial, p. 499-501

Posted on on January 01, 2004

by Lisa S. Meredith

Read More

Access further information on this document at

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Studies have shown that prevalence of depression in primary care settings ranges from 4.8-8.6% with more than half of these patients being undetected and/or under-managed. This epidemi-ological work demonstrated a clear need for increasing access to depression treatments through primary care settings. Following these studies, we observed population receiving treatment for depression in outpatient settings. This treatment trend coincided with the growth of managed care and concomitant cost-containment policies shifting treatment of depression from mental health specialty settings into primary care settings, practical tools for assessing and diagnosing depression in clinical settings, and the availability of second and third generation antidepressant medications which were easier to use in the medical setting because of their quicker response and less severe side effect profiles. Furthermore, efficacious forms of counseling eg, cognitive-behavioral and interpersonal therapies that are structured and time-limited became more available, including brief forms of therapy that could be delivered within the medical setting. National guidelines for the effective treatment of depression in primary care settings led to quality improvement efforts made by health care organizations and providers working within them and a number of successful randomized trials have shown that dissemination of evidence-based guidelines to providers in a variety of practice settings can have positive effects on the processes and outcomes of care for depression. Depression has escaped from Pandora's box and is now being viewed on par with other medical chronic illnesses.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.