Mammography Benefit in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study-2

A Model Evaluation

Published in: International Journal of Cancer, v. 110, no. 5, July 10, 2004, p. 756-762

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2003

by Adriana J. Rijnsburger, Gerritt J van Oortmarssen, Rob Boer, Gerrit Draisma, Teresa To, Anthony B. Miller, Harry J. de Koning

Read More

Access further information on this document at International Journal of Cancer

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

The CNBSS-2 among women aged 50-59 did not show any significant difference in breast cancer mortality between a control arm screened annually by CBE and a study arm screened by CBE and mammography. Because of this design, the benefit of screening compared to no screening could not be evaluated. The authors therefore conducted a modeling effort to estimate the benefit of mammography or CBE compared to no screening. They incorporated demographic, epidemiologic and screening characteristics of the CNBSS-2 in MISCAN. Stage-specific sensitivities of CBE, with and without mammography, and breast cancer incidence rate in the trial were estimated by comparing observed trial data with model predictions. The authors predicted the number of breast cancer deaths for both study arms of the CNBSS-2 and in the absence of screening, assuming improvement in prognosis by early detection. The authors estimated a 24-29% higher breast cancer incidence rate in the CNBSS-2 than the average Canadian rate. Estimated sensitivity of CBE (control arm) varied from 0.29 to 0.48 for stage T1c and from 0.6 to 0.65 for stage T2+. Estimated sensitivity of CBE supplemented with mammography (study arm) varied from 0.5 to 0.79 for stage T1c and was 0.95 for stage T2+. Expected breast cancer mortality reduction by annual CBE screening is 20.5% compared to no screening. Estimated breast cancer mortality reduction by mammography screening compared to no screening for the CNBSS-2 fell within the range 13.6-34.1%. Enrolled women had above average risk. Screening sensitivity in both arms was high. A benefit of mammography screening is supported by our modeling of the CNBSS-2 results.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.