Are Physician-Derived Disease Severity Indices Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with End-Stage Liver Disease?

Published in: American Journal of Gastroenterology, v. 99, no. 9, Sep. 2004, p. 1726-1732

Posted on on January 01, 2004

by Fasiha Kanwal, Ron D. Hays, Amy Kilbourne, Gareth S. Dulai, Ian M. Gralnek

Read More

Access further information on this document at American Journal of Gastroenterology

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

OBJECTIVES: Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score is now often used as an overall indicator of health status for patients with end-stage liver disease. However, there are no data evaluating the associations between MELD scores and patient reports of health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: Two hundred-three patients with end-stage liver disease completed a disease-targeted HRQOL instrument (the LDQOL 1.0). Patients also rated the severity of their liver disease and reported number of disability days attributed to their liver disease in the preceding month. MELD and Child Turcott Pugh (CTP) scores were calculated for all patients. Associations of MELD and CTP scores with patient-derived outcomes were estimated. RESULTS: The mean MELD and CTP scores were 12 and 7, respectively, indicating mild severity of liver disease. HRQOL of patients was generally poor, with the mean SF-36 physical and mental component summary scores of 35 and 40. Seventy percent of patients rated their liver disease symptoms as moderate to severe. Similarly, 70% reported being disabled from their liver disease. MELD was associated with physical functioning scale and the physical component summary (PCS) score in patients with end-stage liver disease. In contrast, CTP score was significantly associated with physical functioning, role limitations due to physical health problems, PCS score, effects of liver disease, sexual functioning, and sexual problems. Both MELD and CTP scores correlated with self-rated severity of liver disease symptoms but not with self-reported disability days. CONCLUSIONS: Despite objectively mild liver disease, the subjective HRQOL of this cohort was severely impaired. CTP score was more closely associated with patient-reported estimates of HRQOL than the MELD score. CTP or disease-specific HRQOL instruments may compliment MELD by providing insights into outcomes of importance to patients with low risk of mortality.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.