Half Standard Deviation Estimate of the Minimally Important Difference in HRQOL Scores
ResearchPosted on rand.org 2004Published in: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, v. 4, no. 5, Oct. 2004, p. 515-523
ResearchPosted on rand.org 2004Published in: Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, v. 4, no. 5, Oct. 2004, p. 515-523
In addition to statistical significance, it is important to evaluate the magnitude of differences in health-related quality of life over time. Interest in establishing the minimal difference that is clinically important or the minimally important difference has burgeoned over the last few years. This review summarizes some of the leading approaches to estimating the minimally important difference, offers caveats on the minimally important difference estimation based on existing literature and provides recommendations for future work. The authors recommend using multiple anchors to estimate the minimally important difference, using only anchors that correspond to minimal change in health-related quality of life, reporting information about the variation around the estimates, and providing bounded estimates to reflect the uncertainty.
This publication is part of the RAND external publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.
RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.