Welfare Reform, Work and Wages

A Summary of the US Experience

Published in: CESifo DICE Report, no. 2, Feb. 2005, p. 8-12

Posted on RAND.org on December 31, 2004

by Jeffrey Grogger, Lynn A. Karoly

Read More

Access further information on this document at www.cesifo-group.de

This article was published outside of RAND. The full text of the article can be found at the link above.

Economic theory predicts that it should be possible to raise work effort either using sticks, such as work requirements and time limits, or carrots, such as financial incentives. Results from dozens of welfare reform studies largely bear this prediction out. At the same time, those studies reveal that the magnitude of those effects tends to be modest. This finding has important implications, particularly for the long term. Policy reformers often speak of work as first step toward a "virtuous cycle" by which recipients eventually leave the welfare rolls. The idea is that increased employment leads to higher wages, which in turn result in greater work effort and eventually higher incomes. In order for the virtue to start cycling, however, today's work must generate tomorrow's wage gains. This, in turn, requires that wages grow with experience and that experience grows enough to generate meaningful wage gains. Recent work has provided mixed results regarding the return to experience facing low-skill workers such as welfare recipients. With the prospects for substantial wage growth in doubt, the policy tradeoffs between alleviating need, limiting dependency and promoting work can be expected to dominate future welfare reform debates.

This report is part of the RAND Corporation External publication series. Many RAND studies are published in peer-reviewed scholarly journals, as chapters in commercial books, or as documents published by other organizations.

Our mission to help improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis is enabled through our core values of quality and objectivity and our unwavering commitment to the highest level of integrity and ethical behavior. To help ensure our research and analysis are rigorous, objective, and nonpartisan, we subject our research publications to a robust and exacting quality-assurance process; avoid both the appearance and reality of financial and other conflicts of interest through staff training, project screening, and a policy of mandatory disclosure; and pursue transparency in our research engagements through our commitment to the open publication of our research findings and recommendations, disclosure of the source of funding of published research, and policies to ensure intellectual independence. For more information, visit www.rand.org/about/principles.

The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND's publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions of its research clients and sponsors.